2009年6月12日 星期五

It has to be balanced, economically, and environmentally! 我之所以~~

The reason I posted the news of the Legislative Yuan passed renewable energy development statute in its third reading, is not because of the pending raise in eclectricity bill, but because of the grave concerns about the process of producing the renewable evergy.

It has to be balanced, economically, and environmentally!!!!

I'm curious about the benefits and the harm of growing bio-fuels in recession paddy fields. Who can provide an explanation?



我之所以貼上「再生能源發展條例」在立法院三讀通過的消息,
不只是因為電價將漲的問題,而是再生能源怎麼處理的問題。

其中,以利用休耕地或閒置農林牧地栽種能源作物,由農發基金提供補助這一項來說,農委會主委陳武雄曾表態,反對栽種生質能源作物。到底栽種生質能源作物可以減少多少對石油的依賴?但是否對環境造成更大傷害?這些都應該納入考量才對,否則只是頭痛醫頭,腳痛醫腳,永遠沒箇完了。

有沒有人能針對這個部份提出說明呀?

沒有留言:

張貼留言